02175nas a2200277 4500000000100000000000100001008004100002260000900043653001700052653001700069653002000086653001200106653001700118653001800135653001900153653001500172653001000187653001500197653001100212653001200223100001600235245009900251300001000350490000700360520153000367 2024 d c202410aAnglo-Saxons10aCentral Asia10acollective West10afascist10afifth column10aforeign agent10aforeign policy10aideologeme10aNazis10apropaganda10aRussia10aUkraine1 aGraeme Herd00aThe Atlanticist Anglo-Saxon Reich and All That: How Russia Understands Strategic Confrontation a46-710 v233 a

Utilizing the British Broadcasting Corporation Monitoring (BBCM) service to track and analyze the use of the term “Anglo-Saxons” by Russian officials, media representatives, state policy documents, as well as wider advocates of Russia’s narrative, this article surveys how Putin’s regime references it. The term’s meanings are open-ended, dynamic, and evolving, and its applications tend to be context-sensitive. “Anglo-Saxons” functions as an epithet, trope, synonym, metaphor, and analogy in contemporary Russian discourse during Putin’s fifth term. It represents a “collective West” perceived as intent on destabilizing Russia. The supposed threat of “Anglo-Saxons” is used to justify political choices, legitimize internal order, characterize Russia’s alternative geopolitical identity, and outline its vision of a preferred global order. Following a genealogy of the term, tracing its evolving meanings through the medieval, early modern, and modern periods, the article identifies three core ways in which official discourse deploys the “Anglo-Saxon” concept: 1) “Anglo-Saxon Atlanticists” and the “collective West”; 2) the “Anglo-Saxon Reich” – portraying the “fascist Anglo-Saxons elite” and “Ordinary Nazis”; and 3) “Anglo-Saxons” as “Fifth Column” and “Foreign Agent.” Finally, the article concludes by exploring the trajectory of “Anglo-Saxon” usage and reflecting on its efficacy in legitimizing current Russian policies and strategies.