01565nas a2200229   4500000000100000000000100001008004100002260000900043653002800052653002500080653001900105653001900124653002200143653002200165653002600187653002500213100001800238245004500256300001200301490000700313520101500320       2024                            d  c202410agreat power competition10agrey zone activities10aHybrid threats10ahybrid warfare10airregular warfare10apolitical warfare10astrategic competition10aunrestricted warfare1 aHeather Gregg00aHybrid Threats and Strategic Competition  a159-1710 v233 a<p>Strategic competition is not new, nor is the use of activities short of warfare by governments to shape the international system in their favor. However, the ability of state and non-state actors to directly influence populations through a range of rapid and non-attributable actions is different from previous iterations of strategic competition. These activities, referred to in this article as hybrid threats, directly challenge state sovereignty and represent the key distinguishing feature of contemporary strategic competition. To clarify this argument, the article aims to provide working definitions of strategic competition and its distinction from great power competition; to explain what hybrid threats and hybrid warfare are and their roles in the broader strategic objectives of state and non-state actors; to describe how strategic competitors and adversaries perceive these activities; and to emphasize the importance of building resilience within populations to counter hybrid threats.</p>