@article{23130,
  keywords = {A2/AD, anti-access, area denial, competition continuum, conventional conflict, grey zone, Hybrid threats, intermediate force capabilities, non-kinetic, non-lethal, threshold},
  author = {Peter Dobias and Kyle Christensen},
  title = {The 'Grey Zone' and Hybrid Activities},
  abstract = {<p>Military operations in the grey zone (defined here as the space between peace and war where states are currently involved in a competition continuum) present a unique challenge for military planners. Potential adversaries—well aware of NATO’s conventional lethal capabilities—have been using the space below the lethal threshold of conflict with impunity to further their objectives. To re-establish effective deterrence, it is imperative that NATO develops the ability to deny its adversaries the ability to act freely in this zone below conventional conflict. That requires imposing a cost on hostile actors acting below the lethal threshold of open conflict, across multiple domains, from the tactical through the operational to the strategic level. Intermediate Force Capabilities (IFC) are the kind of tools that provide effective means of response below the lethal threshold both tactically and operationally and can effectively shape the environment across domains up to the strategic level.</p>
},
  year = {2022},
  journal = {Connections: The Quarterly Journal},
  volume = {21},
  chapter = {41},
  pages = {41-54},
  month = {2022},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.11610/Connections.21.2.03},
  language = {eng},
}